Post-operative clinic follow-up is less intense after MicroPulse TLT than after incisional or filtering surgeries. Additionally, both younger and older patients may either be their own sole caretakers or are the caretaker for others, and the physical restrictions would make daily life difficult or impossible to navigate. I also have elderly patients who are on blood thinners and are not good candidates for incisional surgeries. This is important for my younger patients who cannot take time off after surgery to be down for a potentially long period of time without heavy lifting or bending (as in the case of incisional glaucoma surgeries).
The procedure requires minimal patient downtime or disruption. I also have not seen any significant visual loss or even any significant macular edema as a result of my MicroPulse treatments. There is no extensive tissue disruption and the procedure will not preclude future glaucoma treatment options. Patients do not have to worry about the possible health effects of prolonged anesthesia or risk of infection. MicroPulse TLT is non-incisional and has a favorable safety profile. The procedure is also very patient-friendly, making it a viable option for glaucoma patients who do not want the break from their current lifestyle that would be required if they were to proceed with incisional surgical options.
In my previous post, I discussed how I use MicroPulse transscleral laser therapy (TLT) in my practice and the value of having such a flexible tool.
0 kommentar(er)
